Form of Revision in District Court - Free Template PDF India

About this agreement

FORM OF REVISION IN DISTRICT COURT

Need a reliable Form of Revision in District Court format to challenge a lower court's order swiftly and effectively? Our ready-to-use Form of Revision in District Court sample in PDF and Word formats is designed for Indian legal professionals, litigants, and advocates seeking to file revision petitions under Section 397 of the CrPC or relevant CPC provisions.

What is a Form of Revision in District Court?

A Form of Revision in District Court is a formal legal document used to seek revision of orders or judgments passed by subordinate courts, such as Magistrates or Munsif Courts, in the District Court. Governed primarily by Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for criminal matters or Section 115 of the CPC for civil cases, this petition allows higher judicial scrutiny to correct errors, irregularities, or jurisdictional issues without appealing the final judgment. It's crucial in maintaining judicial fairness and preventing miscarriage of justice.

In India, District Courts handle a high volume of revision applications, making a standardized Form of Revision in District Court format indispensable for timely filings. Whether you're correcting procedural lapses or substantive errors, this template ensures compliance with court requirements.

Why is a Form of Revision in District Court Important?

Filing a revision petition is vital when the lower court's decision suffers from material irregularity, illegality, or jurisdictional error. Unlike appeals, revisions focus on the legality of proceedings rather than merits, offering a faster remedy. Key benefits include:

Quick Judicial Review: Addresses grave injustices without lengthy appeals.
Cost-Effective: Minimal court fees compared to full appeals.
Legal Compliance: Meets District Court formatting and stamping norms.
Professional Edge: Pre-drafted clauses save time for busy lawyers.

Using our Form of Revision in District Court sample, you avoid drafting errors that could lead to dismissal, ensuring your petition is heard on merits.

Key Elements of a Form of Revision in District Court Format

A comprehensive Form of Revision in District Court template must include:

Court Details: Heading with District Court name, case number, and revision petition number.
Parties Involved: Petitioner (revisionist) and respondent details.
Facts of the Case: Chronological summary of lower court proceedings.
Grounds for Revision: Specific errors, illegality, or irregularity cited with legal provisions.
Prayer Clause: Clear request for setting aside/modifying the impugned order.
Affidavit and Verification: Sworn statement by petitioner.
Annexures: Certified copies of impugned order, lower court records.

Our customizable legal template incorporates all these, ready for PDF/Word download.

Who Should Use the Form of Revision in District Court?

This format is ideal for:

Advocates handling criminal or civil revisions.
Litigants in property disputes, family matters, or criminal trials.
Businesses challenging commercial court orders.
Individuals facing Magistrate Court convictions or acquittals needing review.

Common use cases: Quashing illegal summons, revising bail orders, or correcting civil decree errors in District Courts across India.

Download Your Form of Revision in District Court Today!

Get instant access to our free download option or premium customizable versions. Edit in Word, print, and file confidently. Paid plans offer AI-assisted customization or lawyer-reviewed templates for complex cases.

Important Note

While our Form of Revision in District Court format is a ready-to-use legal template compliant with Indian court standards, it's recommended to consult a local advocate for case-specific advice. Customize as per your facts, and pair with related documents like affidavits or vakalatnama. Explore more: revision petition sample, CrPC 397 format, District Court petition templates, India legal forms.

(Word count: 528)

FORM OF REVISION IN DISTRICT COURT

FORM OF REVISION IN DISTRICT COURT

IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE, AGRA

Civil Rev. No..................... of 19....................

U/s. 115 C. P. C.

A. B................................................. Plaintiff/Applicant.

versus

C. D.......................................... Defendant/Respondent.

Valuation of suit property: Rs. 5000/-

Nature of suit: Suit for injunction

Court fee paid on Revision Application: Rs. 10/-

Sir,

The Revision application against the order dt. 25-11-1985 of the XVIII Additional Munsif, Agra in suit No. 742 of 1973 is most respectfuly submitted on the following grounds:

GROUNDS OF REVISION

1. Because the learned Trial Court has failed to exercise his jurisdiction vested in him, in not considering the amendment application in its proper and legal aspect.

2. Because the amendment sought does not purport to change the nature of the suit, it is a suit for injunction against the defendant for restraining him from illegally closing the door, windows and sky lights of the plaintiff and complainant after having to his notice the correct facts about the nature of possession of the defendant over the servient heritage, asked to add a relief about compensation as envisaged in S. 32 of the Easements Act and its illustration which directly applies to the applicant’s case. The Learned Munsif has not given any consideration to this contention of the applicant and has arbitrarily passed the impugned order.

3. Because the applicant has also sought to amend the site plan of the property about which the relief of injunction is claimed. The learned Munsif has not considered at all this part of the proposed amendment and has evaded to give his decision thereon.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the Revision application may be allowed, setting aside the order of the learned Munsif and allowing the application for amendment of the plaintiff.

Dated 6-12-1985. Counsel for the Plaintiff

case law

Section 115

INTERFERENCE WITH ERRONEOUS DECISION ON POINT OF LIMITATION.

When the lower Court decides a question of limitation erroneously on a wrong view of law, the High Court will interfere with such decision in its revisional jurisdiction1.

INTERFERENCE WITH ORDER DISPOSING OF AMENDMENT APPLICATION.

A trial Court while disposing of an application for amendment of pleadings exercises a judicial discretion vested in it by law, the High Court in exercise of its revisional powers has to see whether the discretion vested in the trial Court has been exercised or not and whether it has exercised the jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity2.

ISSUE OF LAW REQUIRING EVIDENCE TO BE RECORDED DECIDED AS PRELIMINARY ISSUE — INTERFERENCE IN REVISION.

Where the order of the trial court treating an issue of law on which evidence had to he recorded as preliminary issue is erroneous and must he treated as cither without jurisdiction or in excess of jurisdiction, the High Court can set aside such an erroneous order in its revisional jurisdiction3.

REFUSAL TO INTERFERE WHEN SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE DONE.

Where a case even fell under any of the three clauses, but substantial justice has been done by the impugned order of the Court below, between the parties, and the applicant revisionist is not going to lose any amount if the decree is passed on interference is called for4.

WHEN REVISION RENDERED INFRUCTUOUS.

Where a judgment debtor’s house was attached in execution proceedings, objection was filed by judgment debtor claiming protection under section 60(1) (C.C.C.), which was dismissed. The judgment debtor died pending revision, the revision was held to have become infructuous5.

NON-FILING OF COPY OF TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT IN REVISION: EFFECT OF.

According to Rules and Orders of Punjab High Court, the petition for revision of an order of the appellate Court copy of order of the Court of first instance shall be accompanied without the revision shall be incompetent if copy is not filed within time6.

LIMITATIONS OF HIGH COURT.

High Court will be slow to interfere unless there is manifest prejudice to either party. Muchlcss there should be ground for interference in revision.7

High Court cannot correct errors of fact, however, gross or even errors of law unless the said errors gave relation to the jurisdiction of the Court to try the dispute.8

High Court’s powers are Limited to see whether in a case decided there has been an assumption of jurisdiction where none existed, or a refusal of jurisdiction where it did, or there has been material irregularity or illegality in the exercise of that jurisdiction. The exercise of power is confined to jurisdiction and jurisdiction alone9.

The power under Order 41 Rule 27 should be exercised cautiously and sparingly.10

1. Mst. Sundari v. Sakal Salim, A.I.R. 1973 Pat. 150: 1973 B. L. J. R. 89.

2. Dr. Mrs. Sarojini Pradhan v. Krirodc Chandra Pradhan, (1973) 39 C. L. T. 330.

3. Smt. Ram Kali v. Sohan Lal, A.I.R. 1985 P&H 124: 1984 Rev. L. R. 538: 1984 Punj. L. J. 600: 1984 (2) Land. L. R. 458.

3a. Mrs. Tara Sarup v. M/s. Piara, Singh Gurmail Singh and others, A.I.R. 1985 N. O. C. 167 (P&H): (1984) 86 P. L. R. 605.

4. Dena Bank v. M/s. Devi Exhibitors, Surat, A.I.R. 1985 Guj. 51, (55): 1984 (2) Guj. L. R. 1040: 1984 Guj. L. H. 192.

5. K. L. Bawa v. M/s. Basant Textiles, Meerut, A.I.R. 1982 Punj. 275: 1982 Rev.L.R. 120: (1982) 84 P.L.R. 258: (1982) 1 Rent.L.R. 309.

6. Shafiq Ahmed v. Mst. Shah Jehan Begum, A.I.R. 1981 Delhi 202.

7. Arun General Industries Ltd. Calcutta v. Rishab Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd., 1972 M.P.L.J. 42.

8. M/s. Kalinga Otto Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Charanjit Kochhar, 1971 (2) C.W.R. 748.

9. The Superintending Canal Officer v. Hukum Chand, A.I.R. 1972 P&H 60: 1971Cur. L.J. 732: AA.I.R. 1963 S.C. 698 followed.

10. Jhari Rai v. Sukar Mandal 1996 (3) C.C.C. 164 (Pat.).

0 PDF downloads

0 Word downloads

Download PDF₹99 Download Word₹99

Important Guidelines

Guideline for Drafting a Form of Revision in District Court:

Usage: A form of revision in a district court is a legal document used to request the review and correction of judgments, orders, or decisions made by lower courts. It is typically filed with the district court and is crucial for seeking remedies or redressal of legal issues arising from lower court decisions. Here's a concise guideline:

Title and Identification: Begin with a title like "Form of Revision in District Court" and identify the parties involved, including the petitioner (appellant) and respondent (if applicable).

Introduction: Provide a brief introduction explaining the purpose of the form, which is to seek a review and revision of the lower court's judgment or order.

Case Information: Include essential case details, such as the lower court's name, case number, and date of the judgment or order under review.

Grounds for Revision: Clearly state the grounds on which the revision is sought, such as legal errors, procedural irregularities, or newly discovered evidence.

Supporting Documents: Attach relevant documents or evidence that support the claims made in the revision form.

Prayer for Relief: Clearly state the specific relief sought, which may include the reversal of the lower court's decision, modification of the order, or a new trial.

Common Mistakes to Avoid:

Incomplete Information: Ensure that all necessary case details and grounds for revision are accurately and comprehensively provided. Missing Deadlines: Be aware of any statutory or court-imposed deadlines for filing a revision, and adhere to them to avoid dismissal. Failure to Attach Evidence: Support your claims with the necessary documents, as unsupported allegations may not be considered. Unclear Relief Sought: Specify the relief you are seeking clearly and precisely to avoid confusion. Consult with legal counsel or review local court rules and procedures when drafting a form of revision in a district court to ensure it complies with specific requirements, deadlines, and formatting standards, thereby increasing the likelihood of a successful revision.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Form of Revision in District Court?→

The Form of Revision in District Court is a standard legal template used to file a revision petition under Section 397 of the CrPC in Indian District Courts, challenging orders from subordinate Magistrates.

Is the Form of Revision in District Court legally valid in India?→

Yes, this form complies with Indian legal standards under CrPC and is valid for use in District Courts across India, subject to local court rules and procedures.

Does the Form of Revision in District Court require stamp duty or court fees?→

It requires court fees as per the Court Fees Act applicable in your state; no specific stamp duty on the form itself. Verify the exact fee schedule for revisions in your District Court.

In what format can I download the Form of Revision in District Court?→

Download available in editable Word (.docx) and non-editable PDF formats for convenience in Indian legal proceedings.

Can I customize or edit the Form of Revision in District Court?→

Yes, the Word version is fully customizable. Insert case details, parties, and grounds for revision to tailor it for your specific matter in India.

Who should use the Form of Revision in District Court and when?→

Use it when challenging Magistrate Court orders via revision. Ideal for petitioners or advocates in criminal cases seeking review in District Courts in India.