Order 34 CPC Application Template India

About this agreement

Title: Application Under Order 34 CPC Format

Are you involved in a mortgage suit and need a reliable Application Under Order 34 CPC Format to streamline your legal proceedings? This essential document under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, is crucial for parties seeking decrees in suits relating to mortgages of immovable property in India.

Order 34 of the CPC governs the procedural aspects of mortgage suits, including applications for preliminary decrees, final decrees, redemption, foreclosure, or sale. Whether you're a mortgagor seeking redemption or a mortgagee pursuing foreclosure, having the correct Application Under Order 34 CPC Format ensures compliance with court requirements and protects your interests effectively.

Why is Application Under Order 34 CPC Format Important?

In mortgage-related litigation, precision is paramount. An accurately drafted Application Under Order 34 CPC Format helps in invoking specific provisions like Rule 1 (preliminary decree in redemption suits), Rule 4 (final decree), or Rule 8 (foreclosure suits). It prevents procedural lapses that could lead to dismissal or delays, saving time and costs. Courts in India strictly adhere to CPC mandates, making a ready-to-use Application Under Order 34 CPC Format indispensable for lawyers, litigants, and legal professionals handling property disputes.

Using a professional template minimizes errors, ensures all necessary averments are included, and aligns with judicial precedents. It's particularly vital in high-stake cases involving immovable property values running into crores.

Key Elements of Application Under Order 34 CPC Format

A standard Application Under Order 34 CPC Format includes:

Heading and Court Details: Title of the court, suit number, and parties' names.
Applicant's Particulars: Full details of the mortgagor or mortgagee, including relationship to the suit.
Facts of the Case: Description of the mortgage deed, date, amount, property details, and default events.
Grounds for Application: Reference to specific Order 34 rules (e.g., Rule 2 for accounts), supported by evidence.
Reliefs Sought: Prayer for preliminary/final decree, accounts, costs, and interest calculations.
Verification and Affidavit: Sworn statement confirming facts.
Annexures: Copies of mortgage deed, payment receipts, valuation reports.

This customizable legal template in PDF or Word format is designed to meet Indian court standards.

Who Should Use Application Under Order 34 CPC Format?

Mortgagees: Banks, financial institutions, or individuals enforcing security interests.
Mortgagors: Borrowers applying for redemption or accounts.
Law Firms: Handling civil suits in district courts, high courts, or debt recovery tribunals.
Real Estate Developers: In disputes over property liens.

Common use cases include redemption suits, foreclosure proceedings, and applications for personal decrees under Order 34 Rule 6.

Download Your Application Under Order 34 CPC Format Now

Get instant access to our ready-to-use, customizable Application Under Order 34 CPC Format for free download in PDF/Word. Tailor it to your case with AI assistance or professional legal help. Perfect for quick filings in Indian courts.

Important Note

While this Application Under Order 34 CPC Format serves as a legal template sample, it's recommended to consult a qualified lawyer for customization to fit specific facts. Not legal advice—ensure compliance with latest CPC amendments. Explore related formats like Mortgage Deed Format, Preliminary Decree Format, or Affidavit under Order 39 CPC for comprehensive legal documentation.

(Word count: 528)

APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 34, C. P. C.

APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 34, C. P. C.

IN THE COURT OF....................

Suit No.............. of 19..................

C. D................................................................... Plaintiff

versus

C. F................................................................ Defendant

The applicant most respectfully submits as under: ?

1. That a preliminary decree for redemption of the mortgaged property was passed by the Court on............................ (date) in favour of the plaintiff.

2. That under the said decree the plaintiff was liable to pay Rs............................. to the defendant by............................ (date)

3. That the plaintiff (applicant) has paid all amounts due from him under the decree aforesaid in the court vide receipt annexed to the application.

PRAYER

It is therefore most respectfully prayed that the mortgaged property or part thereof has been sold in pursuance of a decree. The plaintiff must make a payment in addition to the amount due under the decree together with a sum equal to ............................ % of the amount of the purchase money paid into the court by the purchaser.

It is accordingly prayed.

Plaintiff

Through Advocate

Place

Dated:

CASE LAW

ORDER 34, RULE 1, PARTIES TO SUITS FOR FORECLOSURE, SALE AND REDEMPTION.

WHEN GUARANTOR MAY BE PROCEEDED AGAINST ? GUIDANCE FOR.

The decree in execution is a comprehensive decree, personally against the defendants including the respondent and also against the mortgaged property. Since

a portion of the decreed amount is covered by the mortgage, the decree-holder has to proceed against the mortgaged property first and then proceed against the guarantor.

But where the decree-holder had proceeded against the mortgaged property and also against the principal debtor, execution against the guarantor is maintainable1.

APPLICATION FOR REDEMPTION FILED WITHIN LIMITATION PERIOD ? INTIMATION OF ? ISSUED THROUGH POST ? POSTMAN REPORTED OF NOT FINDING HIM IN THE VILLAGE ? DISMISSAL IN DEFAULT ? ON THIS POSTAL REPORT ? IMPROPER.

Where the appellant had made an application for redemption within limitation period. But the postman reported as to the information issued to him through post that he was not found in the village, and the application for redemption was dismissed on this postal report. Held that the application for redemption would be within time in this view of the matter on disregarding the illegal order of dismissal for default. The application for redemption was directed to be taken on file for being disposed of in accordance with law treating the same as within time2.

OUTER LIMIT FOR USUFRUCTURY MORTGAGE.

Order 34 Rules 7 and 8

The order limit for an usufructuary mortgagor for making payment of the amount due under the preliminary decree is passing of the final decree or the date of confirmation of the sale3.

SCOPE OF THE RULE.

A proceeding is a prescribed course of action for the enforcement of a legal right, e. g., the right of the plaintiff to apply for a final decree. Such right was to be enforced by the making of an application as prescribed by Rule 5 (3) of Order 34, when the High Court by its order stayed all further proceedings in the suit, the effect of it was that the action that would be taken for the passing of a final decree was also stayed. In other words, the filing of an application for a final decree, the court cannot entertain such an application4.

APPLICABILITY OF THE RULE

Order XXXIV, Rule 5 Civil Procedure Code is applicable and not the general provision of Section 148 for the jurisdiction for extention of time for deposit of the price of redemption5.

NECESSITY FOR FINAL DECREE.

In a case where only a money decree has been passed initially a final decree under this rule is not necessary although the decretal amount by sale of the judgment-debtor?s property. Where however the property is charged without payment of the decreetal amount, the proper mode of realising the decreetal amount is to obtain a decree absolute for sale6.

COMPETENCY OF COURT.

In a mortgage suit the Court by virtue of the provisions contained in order 34 Rule 5(3), Code of Civil Procedure is competent while passing a final decree to direct that the mortgaged property or a sufficient part thereof be sold7.

COURT?S OBLIGATION UNDER THE RULE

The Court is bound to set aside the sale under this Rule if the payment has been made before confirmation8.

SCOPE OF THE RULE

A suit relating to a mortgage should not be dismissed by reason of non-joinder of parties unless the parties are necessary parties and non-joinder affects the merits of the case. If the parties are merely proper parties, as distinguished from necessary parties, the Court may, though the plaintiff refuses to add them as parties, proceed under O. 1 R. 9 to deal with the matter in controversy so far as regards the rights and interests of the parties before it9.

SCOPE OF SUIT FOR REDEMPTION

In a suit for redemption of a mortgage the question of paramount title to the mortgaged property cannot be gone into10.

1. Union bank of India v. Monku Narayana, (1987) 2 S. C. C. 335.

2. Shir Singh v. Assistant Custodian General and others, (1987) 1 S. C. C. 605.

3. K. Parameswaran Pillai v. K. Sumathi @ Jesis Jessie Jacquiline, 1993 (3) C. C. C. 99 (S. C.).

4. Reba Sircar v. Bisweswar Lal, A. I. R. 1980 Cal. 328: (1980) 84 Cal. W. N. 552: 1980 (1) Cal. H. N. 528: (1980) 1 Cal. L. J. 421.

5. Sulaikha Kunju v. Krishna Pillai, 1985 (1) C. C. C. 813 (814).

6. L. C. Bank v. A. R. M. & Co., A. I. R. 1972 Delhi 118.

7. M/s. Satwant Kochhar & Co. v. Punjab National Bank, New Delhi, 1985 (1) C. C. C. 603 (Delhi).

8. M. Sheck Ali v. State Bank of India (Mad. H. C. ), 1985 (2) C. C. C. 198.

9. Housabai Vishnu Yadav v. Kashinath Padharinath Vanpal, (1972) 74 B. L. R. 706.

10. Sita Ram San v. Islam Mian, A. I. R 1973 Pat. 25.

0 PDF downloads

0 Word downloads

Download PDF₹99 Download Word₹99

Important Guidelines

Guidelines for Drafting Application under Order 34 CPC:

An application under Order 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) is used in mortgage suits, typically when a borrower defaults on a mortgage, and the lender seeks to enforce the security interest in the mortgaged property. Follow these guidelines for effective drafting:

Clearly Identify Parties and Property: Clearly identify the plaintiff (lender), defendant (borrower), and the mortgaged property. Provide precise details such as property description, boundaries, and ownership.

Specify Loan Details: Clearly outline the details of the mortgage, including the loan amount, terms, and conditions. Attach relevant documents such as the mortgage deed and loan agreement.

State Default and Outstanding Amount: Clearly state the default on the part of the borrower and specify the outstanding amount. Provide a breakdown of the principal, interest, and any other charges.

Relief Sought and Sale Procedure: Clearly state the relief sought, typically the sale of the mortgaged property to recover the outstanding debt. Outline the proposed procedure for the sale, adhering to legal and procedural requirements.

Common Mistakes to Avoid:

Vague Property Descriptions: Avoid vague or ambiguous property descriptions. A clear and accurate property identification is crucial for enforcing the security interest.

Incomplete Loan Details: Ensure all relevant loan details are included. Incomplete or unclear information about the mortgage terms may hinder the enforcement process.

Failure to Specify Default: Clearly specify the default on the part of the borrower. Ambiguity in stating the default may weaken the case.

Neglecting Legal Formalities: Familiarize yourself with legal requirements and procedural rules under Order 34 CPC. Neglecting these formalities may impact the enforceability of the application.

By adhering to these guidelines and avoiding common mistakes, you can draft a comprehensive application under Order 34 CPC, enhancing the chances of successfully enforcing the security interest and recovering the outstanding debt through the sale of the mortgaged property.

Frequently asked questions

What is an Application under Order 34 CPC?→

An Application under Order 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is filed in mortgage suits for reliefs such as preliminary decree, accounts, redemption, foreclosure, or sale of mortgaged property in Indian courts.

Is this Application under Order 34 CPC legally valid in India?→

Yes, this template is compliant with Indian CPC provisions and valid for use in courts across India after customization, stamping, and verification by a legal professional.

Do I need to pay stamp duty for this application?→

Yes, as per the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, an Application under Order 34 CPC requires state-specific stamp duty; affix the appropriate value before filing in court.

In what format can I download this Application under Order 34 CPC?→

Download the editable Word or PDF format of the Application under Order 34 CPC template for easy customization, printing, and court submission in India.

When and who should use this Application under Order 34 CPC?→

Mortgagees, mortgagors, or parties in immovable property mortgage suits in India use it during proceedings for decrees on accounts, redemption, or foreclosure under CPC.

Can I customize and edit this Application under Order 34 CPC template?→

Yes, the template is fully customizable; edit details like party names, property descriptions, and reliefs to fit your specific mortgage suit requirements in India.